[ad_1]
The lawyers argued that this would “require relief from this Court,” they would be faced with a separate risk of commingling of their treasury investments, and the step “creates a risk of loss in the event of a need for rapid monetization, or the lack of liquidity in the surety collateral market, which is not an idle concern given the recent bank failures allegedly caused in part by overinvestment in U.S. treasuries.”
[ad_2]
Source link
